Reacción a "Two mutations identified that make the avian flu virus more dangerous in the United States than in Europe"

'This article represents advanced work that seeks to reveal why the H5N1 virus behaves differently in North America and Europe. Researchers use ferret experiments and novel techniques to first determine in parallel which specific cells are infected by American and European H5N1 viruses and, in parallel, sequence the complete genome of both viruses. Using this methodology, they detected two mutations present in the American isolate that were not present in the European one. They verified these results with replication tests of the two viruses in different cell cultures, obtaining results similar to the ferret model. In the next phase, they created viruses with and without the mutations or a combination of both and confirmed that the virus without these mutations could not cause systemic infection and infection of immune system cells. However, each of the viruses with each of the mutations and the virus with both mutations caused infection of immune system cells and systemic distribution. Finally, they studied the mechanisms that changed in relation to the mutations, observing, above all, an improvement in replication and stability in immune system cells. Finally, they studied the possibility of vertical transmission of the virus through the mammary glands and the importance of the route of infection, again demonstrating the wide dispersal capacity of the North American genotype regardless of the route of infection, compared to the European genotype, which, depending on the route of inoculation, produces only a local infection of limited extent'.

What do you think of the article overall? Is it of good quality?

‘I think the article is of good quality as it provides new data that sheds light on some of the reasons for the virus's adaptation to mammals such as cows and domestic cats, but it also acknowledges the limitations of the technologies used precisely because of their novelty, which may limit the interpretation of data related, for example, to the type of cell infected.’

How does it fit in with existing evidence and what new information does it provide?

"The results partly confirm existing data and suspicions, while also raising new questions. The PB2 mutation has also been detected in the mink outbreak in Europe and had already been identified as an important mechanism for adaptation to replication in mammals. The most important contribution of the work is the identification of American IVA replication in immune system cells as one of the mechanisms of systemic dissemination and its link to the mutations described."

Are there any important limitations to consider?

'The two most important limitations are those related to the interpretation of cell identification data using the methodology employed and the limitations of the models used. The breast organoid, for example, reflects the capacity for replication in these tissues but does not provide evidence of the route of transmission between cows and between cows and humans, which is one of the great unknowns'.