Reacción a "Organized scientific fraud is growing rapidly"

The study follows in the footsteps of previous research. It is more robust, although it also has limitations that are clearly outlined in the article itself.

The study aligns with the existing evidence on the topic. There is an awareness that scientific misconduct may be spreading, partly because there are journals that are profitable businesses and only partially adhere to required levels of scrutiny. Additionally, the use of numerical indicators in the evaluation of projects and professionals may be leading to the pursuit of shortcuts. This has been pointed out repeatedly, and in some aspects, corrective measures are being taken.

I believe the study’s limitations are well stated in the article.

It is yet another wake-up call for everyone—scientific professionals and administrators—not to let their guard down on these issues and not to fall for the illusion that four impact indicators solve everything. Training professionals in good scientific practices and the existence of bodies that address these matters is essential. In today’s world, where misinformation is widespread, scientific activity cannot afford to lose the credibility it holds in society.