Reacción a "Colossal Biosciences presents what it calls ‘dire wolves’, extinct for thousands of years"

To truly de-extinct something, you would have to clone it. The problem is we can't clone extinct animals because the DNA is not well enough preserved. Even if you sequence the genome, you can't extract DNA from extinct animals in long enough chunks like you could with a living animal. So the only way to "de-extinct" an animal is to use the new synthetic biology technology like CRISPR-cas9 where it acts like molecular scissors, and you can go and chop out a little bit of DNA and insert a new piece of DNA that effectively results in a genetic change. 

So what Colossal Biosciences have produced is a gray wolf with dire wolf-like characteristics – this is not a de-extincted dire wolf, rather it’s a “hybrid”. And importantly, it's what they think are the important dire wolf-like characteristics. Dire wolves diverged from gray wolves anywhere between 2.5 to 6 million years ago. It's in a completely different genus to gray wolves. Colossal compared the genomes of the dire wolf and the gray wolf, and from about 19,000 genes, they determined that 20 changes in 14 genes gave them a dire wolf.

Another question – how's it going to learn to be a dire wolf? Currently, it's a wolf running around in a paddock. And does the ecosystem it once lived in still exist? It's the classic thing out of the first Jurassic Park movie, where the Triceratops get very sick because it was eating plants that hadn't actually evolved when it was around tens of millions of years ago. Can you also bring back enough animals for the population to not be genetically inbred…this is around 500 individuals, for the population not to suffer the consequences on inbreeding (think the Habsburgs).

In terms of indigenous perspectives on the dire wolf – Colossal have named their indigenous partners and thanked them. But given it's something this significant, it would have been really nice to actually hear from their indigenous partners. What is their viewpoint and what do they think about it? Are they really on board with this? Especially given my experiences of engaging with tangata whenua in Aotearoa New Zealand, where our iwi, hapu, rūnaga and trust partners are all dead set against de-extinction as it’s against tikanga.

But we need to be having these conversations and there needs to be community engagement. We need to have discussions around indigenous intellectual property, bio-prospecting, biopiracy, and what happens if animals are brought back from the dead and they are trademarked by these de-extinction companies?"  
 
Personally, develop de-extinction technology but use it to conserve what we have left. Don’t bring back species from extinction.